|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Grape
Grape Phylloxera
Scientific name: Daktulosphaira vitifoliae
(Reviewed 6/06,
updated 6/06)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
Grape phylloxera is a tiny aphidlike insect that feeds on Vitis
vinifera grape roots, stunting growth of vines or killing
them. This pest prefers heavy clay soils that are found in the cooler grape-growing
regions of the state such as Napa, Sonoma, Lake, Mendocino, and Monterey
counties, as well as the Sacramento Delta and the foothills. Although grape
phylloxera is present in the heavier soils of the San Joaquin Valley, damage
may not be as severe. It is not a pest on sandy soils.
The majority of grape
phylloxera adults are wingless females. They are generally oval shaped, but
those that lay eggs are pear shaped. They are small (0.04 inch long and 0.02
inch wide) and vary in color from yellow, yellowish green, olive green, to
light brown, brown, or orange. Newly deposited eggs are yellow, oval, and about
twice as long as wide. Nymphs resemble adults except they are smaller.
Grape phylloxera
overwinter as small nymphs on roots. In spring when soil temperatures exceed
60°F, they start feeding and growing. First instar nymphs are active crawlers
and may move from plant to plant in the ground, on the soil surface, or by
blowing in the wind. They may also be moved between vineyards on cuttings,
boots, or equipment. Established phylloxera feed externally in groups on roots.
In fall when soil temperatures fall below 60°F, all life stages die except the
small nymphs. There are three to five generations each
year.
Occasionally, winged
phylloxera are seen in V. vinifera vineyards, but they are believed
to be sterile under California conditions.
Grape phylloxera damage the
root systems of grapevines by feeding on the root, either on growing rootlets,
which then swell and turn yellowish, or on mature hardened roots where the
swellings are often hard to see. Necrotic spots (areas of dead tissue) develop
at the feeding sites on the roots. The necrotic spots are a result of secondary
fungal infections that can girdle roots, killing large sections of the root
system. Such root injury causes vines to become stunted and produce less fruit.
Severity of infestation
will differ with the vigor of the grapevine as well as with soil texture and
drainage. Leaf-galling forms of phylloxera that are common in eastern states
are extremely rare in California vineyards.
Resistant rootstocks are the only completely effective means for
phylloxera control in the most severely affected areas. A pesticide treatment
will not eradicate phylloxera populations; the chemical cannot easily penetrate
the heavy soils that this pest prefers. Also, effectiveness of a treatment is
difficult to evaluate because although many phylloxera may be killed,
populations may rebound rapidly and resume feeding on the vines. Because it may
take years of insecticide treatments to reverse severe damage, treatments to
prevent damage may be a better strategy than curative treatments.
Biological Control
Little information on biological control of grape phylloxera is
available; environmental and root conditions are more important than natural
enemies.
Cultural Control
Avoid rootstocks that have V. vinifera parentage because
virulent biotypes of phylloxera can be selected and may eventually damage these
rootstocks (the biotype B damage of the rootstock AXR#1 in many counties in
California is an example of this type of problem). It is necessary to use
rootstocks that have strong resistance and no V. vinifera parentage
for durable protection against phylloxera. Contact your farm advisor for the
most recent information on local rootstock trials and suggestions on the best
rootstock for specific agronomic conditions. When planting a new vineyard use
only clean propagating material and do not hold clean material in infested
areas before planting. Young resistant rootstock vines will support low phylloxera populations
and may be stunted if replanting occurs in heavily infested soils. Contact your
farm advisor for suggestions on replanting procedures.
In the hot Central
Valley, phylloxera damage may be reduced by good water management,
fertilization, and other cultural practices that help limit plant stress.
Organically Acceptable
Methods
Resistant rootstocks are an organically acceptable management tool for
this pest.
Monitoring
and Treatment Decisions
Initial infestations of grape phylloxera appear as a few weakened vines.
These insects are difficult to detect in an apparently healthy vineyard.
Therefore, monitor vines at harvest in an area of the vineyard that has
consistently displayed weaker growth, especially vines at the edges of the weak
areas. Grape phylloxera are more readily identified on vines growing in poor
soils because their impact is greater on these vines than on vigorously growing
vines.
In North Coast vineyards
infected vines may initially exhibit potassium deficiency symptoms. The
infested area expands concentrically at a rate of two- to fourfold a year.
Satellite infestations frequently establish downwind from larger infested
areas. When searching for phylloxera, be aware that populations die out on
declining vines. Therefore, concentrate monitoring efforts on the periphery of
declining areas where damage symptoms are still minimal. Dig near the trunk of
vines under the drip emitter and look for whitish yellow, hooked feeder roots
that are galled. Examine the galls with a hand lens for the presence of
phylloxera.
| Common name
| Amount/Acre** |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
|
(days) |
|
| The following
materials are listed in order of usefulness in an IPM program, taking into
account efficacy and impact on natural enemies and honey bees.
When choosing a pesticide, also consider information relating to environmental impact.
|
| |
| A. |
CARBOFURAN* |
|
|
| |
(Furadan) 4F |
3–6 qt |
|
| |
MODE OF ACTION: A
carbamate (Group 1A)1 insecticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS: Restricted
entry interval: 2 days. Check with your county agricultural commissioner
about the availability of this material under a Special Local Needs permit;
not allowed in certain counties. Must be applied only through drip (trickle)
irrigation systems between harvest and December 1. For use on wine grapes only excluding Thompson Seedless. |
| |
| B. |
SODIUM TETRATHIOCARBONATE |
| |
(Enzone) |
Label rates |
14 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Unknown. A thiocarbonate insecticide. |
| |
COMMENTS: Restricted
entry interval: 4 days. Crop must be at least 1 year old or injury may occur.
Can be applied anytime during the growing season by metering it into
irrigation water in drip, flood, or furrow irrigation systems. When vineyards
have a moderate to high level of infestation, this material may not be effective. |
| |
| C. |
IMIDACLOPRID |
|
|
| |
(Admire Pro) |
7–14 fl oz |
30 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: A
neonicotinoid (Group 4A)1 insecticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS: Restricted
entry interval: 12 hours. Has been shown to reduce populations when applied
in 1 or 2 drip irrigations; also allows an increase in root growth. Best
results occur when 2 applications of 16 oz each are made per year. Soil
moisture is important for effective soil application; follow label
instructions carefully. Do not exceed 0.5 lb imidacloprid/acre/year. Repeat
applications of any neonicotinoid insecticide (acetamiprid-Assail;
imidacloprid-Admire, Provado) can lead to resistance to all neonicotinoids. Alternate neonicotinoids with an insecticide that has a different mode of action to help delay the development of resistance. |
| |
| |
|
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Grape
UC ANR Publication 3448
Insects and Mites
W. J. Bentley, UC IPM Program, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
L. G. Varela, UC IPM Program, Sonoma County
F. G. Zalom, Entomology, UC Davis
R. J. Smith, UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County
A. H. Purcell, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley
P. A. Phillips, UC IPM Program, Ventura County
D. R. Haviland, UC IPM Program, Kern County
K. M. Daane, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
M. C. Battany, UC Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County
Acknowledgment for contributions to the insects and mites section:
J. Granett, Entomology, UC Davis
Top of page
|