|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Grape
Webspinning Spider Mites
Scientific names:
Pacific spider
mite: Tetranychus pacificus
Willamette spider mite: Eotetranychus willamettei
Twospotted spider mite: Tetranychus urticae
(Reviewed 6/06,
updated 6/06)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
The Pacific spider mite
is the primary pest mite species in the San Joaquin Valley and may also be the
primary pest mite in certain North Coast grape-growing areas. Adult Pacific
spider mite females vary from slightly amber to greenish in color. Later in the
season as they go into diapause or under high population densities adult
females can turn orange to reddish. Upon emergence adult Pacific spider mites
are almost void of food spots. As feeding begins usually two large diffuse
spots appear forward and two smaller spots appear on the rear portion of the
abdomen. Pacific spider mite prefers the warmer upper canopy of the vine.
Although it can cause damage early in the season, Pacific spider mite generally
prefers the hotter, dryer part of the season. Because they are so similar in
appearance, it is difficult to discern between the Pacific and Willamette
spider mites unless they are side-by-side. The Pacific mite is larger in size
than the Willamette mite. Pacific spider mite forelegs are reddish in color and
those of Willamette spider mite are translucent to pale yellow.
The Willamette spider
mite is pale yellow. It is often considered an early-season mite. It prefers
the cooler parts of the plant and is found mostly in the shady parts of the
vine. In certain areas (e.g., North Coast) and during certain years, populations
can persist throughout the growing season. Willamette spider mite is primarily
a problem in the Salinas Valley and Sierra foothill production areas where it
can cause economic damage to varieties such as Zinfandel. In the North Coast it
can cause damage in early spring when shoot growth is delayed or later in the
season in vines with small canopies. Willamette spider mite is seldom a pest in
the San Joaquin Valley, especially on Thompson Seedless.
The twospotted spider
mite, Tetranychus urticae, is almost identical in
appearance to the Pacific spider mite except it rarely has spots on the rear of
the body. It is only occasionally found on grapes in California and rarely
causes damage.
Pacific spider mite
damage begins as yellow spots. As damage progresses, dead (necrotic) areas
appear on the leaves. High populations can render the leaves unfunctional with leaf burning and
bronzing and copious amounts of webbing. Damage is worse along the shoulder and
tops of the vine canopies. Willamette spider mite feeding in mid- or late
season causes foliage to turn yellowish
bronze,
but usually no burn occurs unless vines are weak. In red varieties, infested
leaves may turn reddish.
Manage webspinning spider
mites in a vineyard by integrating biological, cultural and chemical controls.
Biological Control (View
photos of natural enemies.)
The western predatory mite, Galendromus (=Metaseiulus)
occidentalis, is commonly present in vineyards and can be quite
effective in reducing all stages of spider mite populations. This mite is
translucent to light amber, pear shaped, and quite active. The effectiveness of
this predator depends upon its ability to increase its population size as the
season progresses. Disruptive sprays applied early will reduce the survival of
this beneficial mite. Naturally occurring predator mites will survive sulfur
sprays and dusts, but released ones may not survive dusting sulfur unless they
have sulfur resistance. Predator mites, including insecticide-resistant ones,
are available commercially to augment populations in the field. Other
predators, including sixspotted thrips (Scolothrips sexmaculatus), can also
be important. To preserve these natural enemies, avoid using disruptive
materials, especially carbaryl, dimethoate, dicofol, and methomyl.
Cultural Control
Apply water or other materials formulated to reduce dust on
roads in the vineyard. If possible, maintain resident vegetation or other cover
in the vineyard middles to further reduce dust. Irrigate in a manner that will
avoid stressing vines. Although overhead watering has been shown to reduce mite
problems, it can also increase some disease problems.
Organically Acceptable
Methods
Organically acceptable methods include biological
and cultural control methods as well as oil or soap sprays.
Monitoring and Treatment
Decisions
Monitor for webspinning spider mites as part of
dormant and budbreak spur monitoring as described in the DELAYED-DORMANT
AND BUD BREAK SAMPLING and record
observations on a monitoring form .
During rapid shoot growth, look for spider mites and predatory mites weekly on
the first emerging leaves. During bloom, follow the
guidelines for MONITORING INSECTS AND SPIDER MITES. When monitoring mites, note
the presence of mite predators. The table below can be used in determining the
treatment guidelines for various combinations of Pacific mite injury levels and
predator-prey distributions in Thompson Seedless raisin vineyards. After bloom,
record your observations on the insect
and mite monitoring form .
| |
Predator-prey distribution ratios for pacific
spider mites in Thompson Seedless raisin vineyards1
|
| Pacific mite injury levels (% leaves infested) 1:
|
Rare (less than 1:30) |
Occasional (1:30 to 1:10) |
Frequent (1:10 to 1:2) |
Numerous (greater than 1:2) |
light (less than 50%)
|
delay treatment to increase predators
|
delay treatment
|
treatment not likely necessary
|
treatment not necessary
|
moderate (50-65%)
|
treat if population is increasing rapidly
|
may delay treatment to increase predation
|
treatment may not be needed if the predator-prey distribution ratio is increasing rapidly |
treatment not needed
|
heavy (65-75%)
|
treat immediately
|
may delay treatment a few days to take advantage of increasing predation |
treatment may not be needed if predators are becoming numerous |
treatment not needed, damage not increasing |
very heavy (greater than 75%)
|
treat immediately
|
treat immediately
|
teat immediately unless predator-prey distribution ratio increasing very rapidly; carefully evaluate damage |
treatment may not be necessary if
population is dropping because of very high (greater than 1:1) predator-prey distribution ratios; carefully evaluate damage |
|
|
| Common name |
Amount/Acre** |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
|
(days) |
|
| The
following materials are listed in order of usefulness in an IPM program,
taking into account efficacy and impact
on natural enemies and honey bees. When choosing
a pesticide, also consider information relating to environmental impact.
|
| |
| A. |
PROPARGITE
|
| |
(Omite) 30WP |
5–9 lb |
21 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION: A Group 141 miticide. |
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: See label. Apply no more than twice /season. Lower rates allow greater survival of beneficials. |
| |
| B. |
FENBUTATIN-OXIDE* |
| |
(Vendex) 50WP |
1–2.5 lb |
28 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Unknown. An organotin miticide. |
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 48 hours. Do not apply more than twice /season. Lower rates allow greater survival of beneficials. |
| |
| C. |
FENPYROXIMATE |
| |
(Fujimite) 5EC |
2pt |
14 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION: A METI (Group 21)1 miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Apply in 50-200 gal water with higher volumes in vineyards with dense canopies. |
| |
| D. |
PYRIDABEN |
| |
(Nexter) 75WP |
Label rates |
7 |
| |
(Pyramite) 60WP |
Label rates |
7 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: A pyridazinone (Group 21)1
miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 12 hours. Alternate with miticides of a different chemistry to minimize the development of resistance. |
| |
| E. |
ABAMECTIN* |
| |
(Agri-Mek) 0.15%EC |
8–16 fl oz |
28 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION: A microbial (Group 6)1 insecticide/miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 12 hours. Do not make more than 2
applications/growing season. Dust on leaves will inhibit absorption of this material. Effectiveness is also reduced by sulfur burn on leaves. |
| |
| F. |
NARROW RANGE OIL#
|
| |
(Saf-T-Side, etc.) |
Label rates |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 4 hours. For Pacific spider mite, apply before
bloom to get the best coverage and to delay the development of the population
by 3–4 weeks. If an additional treatment is needed, apply 2 weeks after berry
set (on raisin and wine grapes only; do not use on table grapes after bloom).
For Willamette spider mite, apply oil after budbreak in a 1% spray. Do not apply within 10 days of a sulfur application. |
| |
| G. |
INSECTICIDAL SOAPS#
|
| |
(M-Pede) |
Label rates |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: Contact including smothering and barrier effects. |
| |
COMMENTS: Restricted entry interval: 12 hours. Can cause berry spotting. |
| |
| H. |
NEEM OIL#
|
| |
(Trilogy) |
Label rates |
0 |
| |
MODE OF ACTION: A botanical (Group 26)1
insecticide/miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 4 hours. For organically grown crops, check with your certifier for any restrictions that apply. |
| |
| I. |
HEXYTHIAZOX |
| |
(Savey) 50DF |
3–6 oz |
|
| |
MODE
OF ACTION: A carboxamide (Group 10A)1 miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 12 hours. For use on nonbearing vines only. Do not
make more than 1 application per year. More effective early in season on egg
stage. If there is an abundance of adults, this material is not effective.
Because this material is applied early in the season, it is best used in vineyards with chronic mite problems. |
| |
| J. |
DICOFOL |
| |
(Kelthane) 50WSP |
2.5 lb |
7 |
| |
MODE
OF ACTION: A Group 201 miticide.
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Restricted entry interval: 48 hours. May not be effective in all areas due to
resistance. Disruptive to predaceous mites and lady beetles. Do not make more than two applications per season. |
| |
| K. |
GALENDROMUS OCCIDENTALIS#
|
| |
COMMENTS:
Releases are most successful when host plants (green beans) are placed directly on vines. Use a minimum of 1,000 predators per acre. |
| |
| |
|
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Grape
UC ANR Publication 3448
Insects and Mites
W. J. Bentley, UC IPM Program, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
L. G. Varela, UC IPM Program, Sonoma County
F. G. Zalom, Entomology, UC Davis
R. J. Smith, UC Cooperative Extension, Sonoma County
A. H. Purcell, Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley
P. A. Phillips, UC IPM Program, Ventura County
D. R. Haviland, UC IPM Program, Kern County
K. M. Daane, Kearney Agricultural Research Center, Parlier
M. C. Battany, UC Cooperative Extension, San Luis Obispo County
Acknowledgment for contributions to the insects and mites section:
J. Granett, Entomology, UC Davis
Top of page
|